Orange entreprise

A better online assistance for Orange Enterprise Customers
Timeframe
Jan 2019 - Apr 2019
4 month timeframe

Process
1. Understand the problem
2. Frame the solution
3. Measure success
Project overview
Orange Enterprise needed help to build a new version of their online “help center”. It would help customers solve autonomously simple problems (like unlock their phones or setup their devices) and therefore reduce the number of calls to their hotline.

This project was not only an opportunity to reduce costs of customer service but also to improve overall quality of their assistance by reducing their hotline congestion.

1. Discovering the problem

Most pro customers don’t want to solve problems themselves. They pay a lot more money than regular customers and expect premium service from Orange. In a professional context, the person responsible for fixing the problem needs to do it ASAP. Taking initiative themselves might cause delay. Delay will have a significant financial impact on their business. Although some customers did try to solve problems themselves online (outside working hours or while traveling for instance)

Research findings

1. Customers that tried to use their online account struggled with a very slow, unreliable and complicated website.

2. When looking for an answer, pro customers go straight to picking up their phone. There was lots of disapproval and mistrust of Orange’s efforts to steer them toward online help.

3. No one wants to read online help.

An opportunity to pivot

If Orange Entreprise wants to reduce customer service cost, they needed to invest in improving their online account first

Conclusion

Short term, our stakeholders decided to maintain their initial vision for this project and this team: building an online help center - while planning longer term for a better online account. Organisational, technical and budgetary constraints.

Top problems to solve

1. Relevant information was hard to find.
2. Available content was too long and hard to understand.
3. No action was offered to help solve the problem.

2. Framing the solution

Accessing the information

Our problem with interviewing users about how they would look for help online was that most of them answered “I won’t". So how do you get reliable data on user’s behaviour about something that doesn’t exist yet?
You do lean experiments!

We did a smoke test with a “fake feature”. We ABC tested 3 versions:

Version A: search field
Version B: dropdown menu
Version C: help widget within the online account

👉 Version B performed best

Helpful and relevant content

We chose to create short and minimalistic articles that go straight to the point.We decided to keep the “fake” search field to gather more data about mostsearched topics and prioritized content writing according to those results.

More autonomy for customers

Our team focused on building a “go directly to...” button that redirects the user to the actual feature described in the article. Very simple and straightforward feature. Yet a pretty costly investment.

Find contact information easily

Let’s not forget about customer go to solution: grab the phone. We convinced stakeholders to simplify access to contact informations (phone, chat). 

Making contact information hard to find was obviously impacting negatively users in need for immediate help. But it was also costing money to Orange, as customers ended up calling other random Orange services anyway.

Scaling up content creation

Our team alone didn’t have the resources, nor the knowledge to write all necessary content. So we built a tool for Orange experts, who could then easily contribute to writing articles.

3. Measuring success

100% of new content is read
30% decrease of online chat for mobile topics
80% requests made in the search field have an answer
2x average time spent on help center since new version
70% of clients use the “go directly to...” feature


Previous Project

Adobe Stock Libraries - E-commerce Wishlist


Next Project

Thales Impact - Feedback app